alphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 1 year agoCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square11arrow-up1176arrow-down11cross-posted to: science[email protected]
arrow-up1175arrow-down1external-linkCarbon released by bottom trawling ‘too big to ignore’, says studywww.theguardian.comalphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square11cross-posted to: science[email protected]
minus-square@NegativeInflinkEnglish-4•1 year agoFor anyone wondering the difference between 370 million tonnes and 37.5 billion tonnes, it’s about 37.5 billion tonnes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•1 year ago370 million is 0.37 billion, so the difference is about 37.13 billion. 370 million tons of carbon from a single source is a considerable amount.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year ago370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
minus-square@NegativeInflinkEnglish2•1 year agoOh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
For anyone wondering the difference between 370 million tonnes and 37.5 billion tonnes, it’s about 37.5 billion tonnes.
370 million is 0.37 billion, so the difference is about 37.13 billion.
370 million tons of carbon from a single source is a considerable amount.
370 million is just under 1% of 37.5 billion. It’s obviously far from the majority but I can see it being something that should be addressed.
Oh, agreed. I just think there are better metrics we can point at other than carbon release for why bottom trawling is a terrible thing for the environment.
Gotcha. That makes total sense.
37.1 billion, but yeah