Keep in mind they’re sophists so it has to be a well-structured logical argument. I don’t know why I keep arguing with these kinds of people. Disclaimer: I’m pro-LGBT.

    • @betterdeadthanredditEnglish
      2•5 months ago

      Apply some religious brainrot or get a few too many concussions, it’ll all fall into place.

    • Rhynoplaz
      2•5 months ago

      The Bible is full of these vile, deceitful creatures that are always getting people into trouble. They are called women and their lack of a penis drives them to evil hysteria! Although, I guess there was one good one, but not until she was forced to have her rapists baby.

    • Ephera
      1•5 months ago

      Yeah, I thought “PIV” was supposed to somehow mean, well, condoms. So, that they were saying you can’t use a condom for butt sex, for whatever reason.

      Because that’s the only answer you need here: If you’re exchanging bodily fluids, stick some rubber in between. Whether that’s anal, oral or vaginal sex.

      And I mean, kissing can spread diseases. Sitting in the same room can spread diseases. Arbitrarily drawing a line around anal sex, not to mention assuming that all and only all gay folks do anal, that entire argument is just completely flawed.

      • tygerprints
        0•5 months ago

        Then that absolutely means that heterosexuality is also immoral, because ask any man alive and they’ll (if theyr’e honest) tell you they crave anal sex whether they are hetero or homo. Recent reports have shown that anal sex is more prevalent among hetero couples than it ever has been among gays.

        Anal sex is NOT the most common way that homosexual men have sex together, and it isn’t even practiced by many gay couples.

        So if that’s your standard for what is moral or immoral, a) you’re an imbecile in every possible way, and b) all human sexuality is wrong and immoral. I choose to see sexuality as something good and enjoyable, so if I’m going to hell for it, I’m gonna have as much fun as I can getting there.