• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    I dunno, I picked RedHat 5.2 as a complete beginner along with fvwm95 and afterstep, and that worked out okay. Of course, that was 25 years ago.

    • @recapitated
      link
      48 months ago

      25 years ago the viability of options were slightly more prescriptive

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      Same. I remember getting interested in Linux in like 1997 or so, and it seemed like RedHat was preferred for newbies.

      Of course, what were the alternatives then? It was basically Slackware (or Suse), Debian, and RedHat (or Caldera). There was no RHEL or Canonical or SElinux back then. It was a different time.

      Hell one of the language packs for installing RedHat was “Redneck”. It was a gimmick to demonstrate localization options.