• @aodhsishaj
    link
    168 months ago

    There’s plenty of BLM adjacent to the park target shooters can go to. Not everyone picks up spent casings or target debris which can be anything from old electronics to paint cans, so what exactly is the argument against this?

    • @BB69
      link
      138 months ago

      For clarification, BLM in this case means Bureau of Land Management

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      128 months ago

      First they make an anti-littering law like this. Then they deny your application for a Tomohawk cruise missile. Wake up sheeple

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        Maybe not a Tomahawk, but look at the existence of the Cybertruck and tell me I don’t need a personal Javelin

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          The second amendment says that the military shouldn’t be allowed to restrict weapon sales to private civillians. If you can purchase a surface to air missile, you should be able to!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            Sure, but there’s basically no tactical value for a surface-to-air weapon compared to the expense both of the platform and of safe storage expenses. The only practical application a typical homeowner would have is interdicting invasive drones, in which case you’re better off with good old fashioned birdshot. The upside of a man-portable surface-to-surface platform like the Javelin is that it allows a gunner stationed in the bed of your pickup to selectively target and eliminate people who can’t merge without even slowing down.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          Why? A cyber truck will go away if you just spritz it with vinegar.

          (It doesn’t have a clear coat.)