• threelonmusketeersM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    After learning a hard lesson regarding cabin pressure and complicated locking mechanisms in the Apollo 1 fire, NASA had designed the Shuttle hatch to open outward. It was a relatively simple procedure, requiring little physical force, as the hatch opened into the vacuum of outer space.

    In the words of Yzma, “why do we even have that lever?”. It seems like it would be appropriate in only a very small set of circumstances, and almost never when the Shuttle was actually in space.

    • @fishos
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      Why would we have the lever that opens the door? Ummm… To open the door. You don’t want the door bolted closed and unable to be opened in an emergency, EXACTLY the accident the quote is referring to.

      • threelonmusketeersM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -29 months ago

        On the ground, yes, but once in space, I’d feel much more comfortable in a spacecraft with the door bolted closed and unable to be opened by accident or intentionally. Yes, a fire in a spacecraft can quickly kill everyone, but wouldn’t depressurizing the spacecraft also kill everyone?

        • @fishos
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          And panicky people like you are why the commander lock now exists on what should otherwise be an always accessible safety mechanism. Astronauts could take their helmet off in space too, should we weld them on then because they only sometimes need them open?

          • threelonmusketeersM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -19 months ago

            Perhaps not welded, but some sort of interlock to prevent opening under the wrong circumstances seems prudent to me.

            I’m still not entirety clear how a door which opens directly to the vacuum of space would be a safety mechanism. Do any such scenarios exist?