@harry_balzac to Chevron 7English • 10 months agoMay I say that this my first post on this community?imagemessage-square12arrow-up1458arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1453arrow-down1imageMay I say that this my first post on this community?@harry_balzac to Chevron 7English • 10 months agomessage-square12file-text
minus-squareDr. BluefalllinkfedilinkEnglish8•10 months agoWasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
minus-square@someguy3linkEnglish4•edit-210 months agoGunpowder. Yes in most cases you have to propel the object. What I’m saying is the physics of kinetics are there, that really can’t be forgotten.
minus-square@Landless2029linkEnglish4•edit-210 months agoEven if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same. The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy. Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.
Wasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
Gunpowder. Yes in most cases you have to propel the object. What I’m saying is the physics of kinetics are there, that really can’t be forgotten.
Even if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same.
The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy.
Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.