• @EdibleFriend
    link
    English
    1711 months ago

    so Starlink already put over 5k up there with talks of taking that up to as many as 42k eventually. How much crap does ATT intend to put up there?

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      English
      811 months ago

      Shhhh. That is future poor peoples problem and capitalism doesn’t think about those people. Now, wouldn’t you love to pay hundreds of dollars a month for the privilege of being able to surf the internet ANYWHERE in the world at lightning fast speeds? Doesn’t that sound great? All the porn all the time. What could be better?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Well the starlink ones aren’t going to be space trash-- they eventually fall out of orbit and burn up. Hopefully these go with the same plan

        • @EdibleFriend
          link
          English
          711 months ago

          The main issue ATM tho, from what I’ve heard, is what this huge amount of extra crap is doing to us studying space from the ground.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            There is that. The other issue which I ignored but is significant is the emissions from the rocket launches getting the satellites up there in the first place

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              Globally, rocket launches are something like 0.005% of the emissions of the airline industry.