Dan Pfeiffer: “To summarize, Johnson demands a border bill in exchange for passing Ukraine aid; the White House and Senate work on a border bill; Johnson opposes the bill without even seeing it, despite repeatedly declaring that the ‘crisis at the border’ is the House GOP’s top priority.”

“Some commentary suggests that Johnson keeps moving the goalpost to prevent his caucus from having to vote on Ukraine aid, which is vehemently opposed by MAGA Republicans but enthusiastically supported by the Republican establishment and more moderate GOPers. With Johnson in perpetual danger of being McCarthy-ed, I am sure avoiding a tough vote is a factor. However, I think Johnson and the Republicans have another more nefarious reason — they want a crisis at the border to help them in the election.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    110 months ago

    As a Canadian I also sometimes envy the opportunities that exist in the USA but I absolutely would not want Canada to be a 51st (& 52nd?) state. (Not would I actually seek to move there)

    You do know that even though they have capitalism in Mexico, it doesn’t trickle down to benefit any of the people there, right?

    Yes, this is an inherent challenge with capitalism (capital concentration).

    I just do not understand why every concept that might work always has to be questioned this way as if it was anymore ridiculous or intolerable than he current migrant situation at the border.

    I mean I think it’s important to question ideas before implementing them, but you’re right that your country (and mine) have some serious challenges to tackle with respect to migration. Mexico also struggles with migration across its southern (and coastal?) border(s).

    It looks like in 2013 about 60% of Mexicans favoured forming a single country with the USA (if doing so would improve their standard of living). That data is over 10 years old and a lot has changed since then but honestly it’s higher than I would have thought.

    • tygerprints
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      Well Canada is a great country also, I’ve been to all the provinces and I spent a couple weeks in Banff and one of the other national parks that I somehow got lost in and had fun finding my way around.

      I think Canada is much more independent and well developed than Mexico. My suggestion about Mexico was only in regard to their struggles to be as independent and gain some financial well being as a people.

      After all I’m merely making a hypothetical suggestion, and not saying it would be easy or could happen overnight. Frankly I’m just a “world without borders” kind of idiotic optimist. I think we make the immigration situation so much harder by denying people the right to even set foot in another country. I’m sure most Mexican nationals would prefer to stay in Mexico if they had the same economic opportunities (and could live without fear of the cartels).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Yeah I’m also interested in reducing barriers to migration from a human rights perspective.

        But I think we need to reduce international disparities in standard of living before open borders would really work.

        I think trade penalties against countries with high degrees of wealth concentration and/or without living wage regulations etc might help. Idk.

        • tygerprints
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          I agree. I feel that we can reduce those disparities if we have more open congress between us and the people we view as “others.” At any rate, I don’t think building high walls and putting up razor wire is ever going to be a good solution to anything going on in the world.