A full-page newspaper defends the punishment high school student Darryl George has faced over his hairstyle.

  • a lil bee 🐝
    link
    245 months ago

    According to the wording of the ad he took out, his argument is focused on length, not style. He explicitly states that the school allows braids, locs, and rows. Then he argues that the CROWN act is very specific about not applying to length.

    This whole thing is really stupid. Length of styling of hair, along with clothing and other personal appearance issues, should be considered speech and protected outside of blatant attempts to disrupt an educational atmosphere. All that said, the school may not be acting in opposition to the letter of the law, even if they definitely are in spirit.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      415 months ago

      or maybe, just hear me out, the dude should join the rest of us in 2023 instead of 1923. It’s a waste of time, resources and effort. Literally nobody is benefiting from him making an issue out of something that simply does not matter.

      And for the record, he’s singling the kid out for being black. I doubt he’d have an issue with a white boy wearing a man bun, or whatever the equivalent would be.

      • @Omgpwnies
        link
        English
        25 months ago

        1923 was also during a period of upheaval for freedom of expression :)