I’m proud to share a status update of XPipe, a shell connection hub and remote file manager that allows you to access your entire server infrastructure from your local machine. It works on top of your installed command-line programs and does not require any setup on your remote systems. So if you normally use CLI tools like ssh, docker, kubectl, etc. to connect to your servers, you can just use XPipe on top of that.

Since the last status update some months ago, a lot of things have changed thanks to the community sharing a lot of feedback and reporting issues. Overall, the project is now in a much more stable state as all the accumulated issues have been fixed. Furthermore, many feature requests have been implemented.

Large connection sets

A lot of work went into improving the application for large use cases when you’re managing hundreds of connections. This includes hierarchical organization features to group all your connections into different categories and subcategories. Furthermore, there have been multiple processing and memory optimizations to ensure that the user experience stays smooth all the time. As a side effect, the memory footprint also has gone down. For people who have to use a potato as their workstation, there’s also now a performance mode setting to disable any visual effects that are not required.

You can also now tag connections by color for organizational purposes to help in situations when many connections are opened in the file browser and terminals at the same time. These colors will be shown to identify tabs everywhere within XPipe and also outside of XPipe, for example in terminal titles using unicode color symbols.

Connections

A new scripting system

XPipe 1.7 comes with a new scripting system, so now you can take your shell environment everywhere. The idea is to create modular and reusable shell scripts in XPipe that you can then use for various different use cases.

You can set certain scripts to be run on init for every connection independently of your profile files, allowing you to set up a consistent environment across all remote systems without any manual setup. In addition, you can choose to bring scripts to all your remote systems. This will make XPipe automatically copy and update these scripts to a target system if needed and put them in your PATH so that you’re able to call them from anywhere.

As of now, there is one set of predefined scripts included for enabling the starship prompt in your shells, mainly as a proof of concept. What you will use the scripting system for is up to you. If you like, you can contribute scripts to be included by default.

Scripts

Other news

  • You can now sync your connection configurations with your own remote git repository

  • You can create fully customized SSH connections by using the OpenSSH config format within XPipe

  • Additional actions for containers have been added, such as attaching to a container or printing the live logs of a container in a terminal session

  • A transparency slider has been added so that you can make all windows partially transparent just as you like

  • Support for many more terminals and text editors across all platforms has been added

  • Support for BSD systems and special login shells like pfSense and OPNsense has been added

  • There’s now support to open an SSH connection in your default installed SFTP client or Termius

  • The .deb and .rpm releases now correctly report all required dependencies. So you can install it on embedded systems or WSL2g without any hassle

  • There are now ARM releases for Linux

  • Support for VMware desktop hypervisors has been added

  • There have been many performance improvements to reduce the startup time, memory usage, file browser loading speed, and more

  • The homepage at https://xpipe.io/ got an upgrade

  • Of course, a lot of bugs have been fixed across the board

Going full-time

A few messages I received and the demand for XPipe so far convinced that there is a market for developing XPipe full-time and financing it by special commercial and enterprise plans for interested customers. It essentially encompasses support for enterprise systems and tools that you normally don’t find outside of enterprises.

This will improve the development speed and quality as I can now fully focus on creating the best possible application. The scope is very small and only involves me, so no investors or other employees. This drastically lowers the break-even value compared to most other tools and allows me to implement a very lenient commercialization.

Essentially, you can use most current features without any limitation for free. Furthermore, most upcoming features will also be included in the free version. The open-source model and license also won’t change. The only features that require a license are integrations for enterprise systems. For example, if you’re trying to connect to a licensed RHEL system or an OpenShift cluster, it will ask you to buy a license. Conversely, with a Rocky Linux system and a k3s cluster, you can use everything for free. These commercial-exclusive implementations will probably not be included in the repository though. Other than that, there are no restrictions.

Outlook

So if you gave this project a try a while ago or it sounds interesting to you, you can check it out on GitHub! There are still more features to come in the near future. I also appreciate any kind of feedback to guide me in the right development direction. There is also a Discord and Slack workspace for any sort of talking.

Enjoy!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The deal breaker for me is that it seems the low-level component that would interface with the shells (presumably managing credentials in some way) is closed source and off-repo. That’s a big red flag for me, no matter how benign the intention.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Yeah I can understand why some people feel that way. Originally this closed part only concerned a very small part, but due to necessary subclassing of that implementation, that kinda evolved to the whole shell handling interface. I always wanted to refactor that aspect and decouple it such that these parts can be included in this repository, but never got around to it.

      Maybe in the future this can be properly addressed because it’s more a matter of a not well thought out structure rather than hiding crazy secret implementation details. The whole project’s vision moved around quite a lot and most stuff was conceptioned before there was even a thought to try to sell it.

    • @Haha
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      What would a better alternative be in that sense?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        A better alternative would be to separate the core open source app from any premium, proprietary add-on features, as the developer hinted at here.

        As someone else pointed out, it’s difficult to agree that this app follows an open source model when the open source portion of it is essentially non-functional and requires the closed source components to be of any practical use. Until that separation occurs, this isn’t really open source; you’re trusting a stranger on the internet with your (or your client’s) network credentials.

        Barring any similar apps, I’ll stick to my password manager and terminal.

        • @Haha
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          I’m with you on that one