• @asteriskeverything
    link
    46 months ago

    Uhh hey man hope you’re enjoying a really great high cause it sounds like it!

    That’s definitely not the train of thought I was going with though. More like we can’t even agree if police brutality is a problem, if the election was stolen/Jan 6 was an insurrection, are democrats consuming baby blood.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -16 months ago

      do you think if we could agree on those issues it would change our material condition? or do you think maybe the conflict between people who should be united as workers is the point and it doesn’t matter how many issues you “solve” they’ll just keep coming?

      • @asteriskeverything
        link
        16 months ago

        I think if we could agree on those issues our country and democracy wouldn’t be at risk of a fascist takeover and civil war. I doubt we would get that far in any living lifetime. Perhaps whatever this current gen being born might get there if we make enough leadway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          I know it’s hard to believe but every election of the last 30 years has been the “most important election of our lifetime”.

          Chronically online people have moved the goalposts of language so everything is now an existential threat.

          What happens when you put up too many signs at work? Suddenly none of them are important.

          You should vote, but if you want to use language like “civil war” you’re gonna get the future you imagine.