• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1311 months ago

    Genocide is genocide.

    Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn’t really harm reduction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -211 months ago

      If we’re here now, then the harm reduction arguments worked while the plan didn’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          We are now in a scenario where we’ll settle for a genocidal monster, because we keep voting for harm reduction. Harm reduction failed in practice; it was never a good idea in the first place.