My takeaway is that it’s only original Rogue fans that care about the delineation of the terms. Is there a modern (i.e. post 2000s game) that matches the definition of a roguelike as given in the article?

  • @Abucketofpuppies
    link
    English
    88
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Here’s how I understand it:

    Rogue-lite: has permanent upgrades that persist between runs.

    Rogue-like: each run is unaffected by any previous run.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2611 months ago

      This is my preferred version. Anything else is overly specific on arbitrary features. It doesn’t matter to me if levels are procedurally generated or randomly chosen from 100 different hand made levels, the result is the same.

    • @micka190
      link
      English
      2311 months ago

      Pretty much, yeah. The genre was called “Rogue-like” because of Rogue, where your runs were all unique. “Rogue-lite” happened when devs wanted to add persistent progress to the game.

      • @Abucketofpuppies
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        Whoa, what a nostalgia trip to pull out of nowhere lol

        • @Viking_Hippie
          link
          English
          011 months ago

          It’s actually still going strong! I started playing daily again a couple months ago after being away for years and it totally still holds up!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Rogue-like: each run is unaffected by any previous run.

      I would tweak this slightly. Each run does not have upgrades that carry over into future runs, but you might unlock new characters to play or items to encounter.

      I would call FTL a Rogue-like, but arguably a new run can be affected by a previous run if you’ve unlocked a new ship design.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      Isn’t a Rogue-lite just a very small or indie sneaky game? :P