• @Potatofish
        link
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Seems to say they were shot for good reason. So, I don’t get it, why use that article?

        • @IndustryStandard
          link
          11 year ago

          You claim that israel did not violate the ceasefire there?

          • @Potatofish
            link
            -11 year ago

            I don’t. No one knows. It’s anecdotal, genius.

            If there are people approaching you in a warzone after they were warned to stop, shooting them is a good call.

            • @IndustryStandard
              link
              11 year ago

              During a ceasefire when you’re not supposed to be in enemy territory?

              It’s clear you are trolling. Hope you get banned.

              • @Potatofish
                link
                -11 year ago

                It clearly says combat zone. And, no, I’m not trolling. The article is written to highlight the fact that it might have been warranted. Not my fault you are slow.

                • @IndustryStandard
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  There is no combat zone it’s a ceasefire.

                  You know what the word ceasefire means?

                  Were these Palestinians invading israel according to the article? Did they cross the giant wall?

                  • @Potatofish
                    link
                    -11 year ago

                    Realistically if someone is pointing a gun at you and ordering you to stop, you stop. Unless of course you have other plans and don’t stop.

                    It would be more reasonable to argue they were stupid rather than the ceasefire was in effect.