• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Tested 5 clients on my PC 3 times each. Times were more or less consistent on each run, biggest variation seemed for Uplay.

    Setup: You are already logged in, there are no pending updates, you terminate client after each run (did not see significant time difference between repeated runs and 1st run after you log in), your logged in Windows account has admin rights so time is not wasted entering password (EGS and Uplay require admin rights to launch), time stops once launcher is usable.

    • EGS - 8 - 10 seconds
    • Steam - 20 seconds
    • GOG - 11 seconds
    • Uplay - 20 - 24 seconds
    • Heroic - 5 seconds

    System: Ryzen 2600 with Samsung 970 EVO (2400 MB/s R/W as per Samsung Magician benchmark)

    • @pivot_root
      link
      English
      1010 months ago

      Is there any chance you can add a test for Heroic launcher as well? I advocate for using it over EGS, and I’d like to know how it stacks up.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        Is heroic only on Linux? I’ve never looked into installing it on Windows. It’s a fantastic front end for the EGS/GOG on my Linux machines though.

        • @pivot_root
          link
          English
          610 months ago

          It’s on Windows as well :)

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            Sweet, thanks! Less Epic and one fewer launcher all in one.

    • Radical Dog
      link
      English
      310 months ago

      Really exposing the Valve fanboyism in the room. Steam genuinely takes quite a long time to start. People pretend it’s quick because they leave it running, while cold booting Epic/alternatives and complaining.