• @Gigan
    link
    -57 months ago

    The last populist TV personality worked out great, so why not?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      “Popular” would probably be more accurate.

      Populist

      populism as an ideology that presents “the people” as a morally good force and contrasts them against “the elite”, who are portrayed as corrupt and self-serving … Populists typically present “the elite” as comprising the political, economic, cultural, and media establishment, depicted as a homogeneous entity and accused of placing their own interests, and often the interests of other groups—such as large corporations, foreign countries, or immigrants—above the interests of “the people”.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        By that metric, anything that is critical of capitalism is populist.

        Really becomes a meaningless phrase.

      • @Gigan
        link
        37 months ago

        I would consider him one, since he hasn’t held public office before. But I’m not sure if there’s a more strict definition.

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          It’s generally defined by a claim to represent some unified idea of the “true people” as opposed to the corrupt elites running everything.

          Stewart is not pretending to represent anyone, he’s just a guy highlighting problems and making jokes on television. If he ran for office he could decide to use populist or non-populust rhetoric.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think Volodymyr Zelenskyy was more recent than Trump but I would need to check the dates.

      Stewart isn’t a populist and neither is Volodymyr. Being popular isn’t the same as populist.

      • @dezmd
        link
        English
        17 months ago

        What kind of outerspace rationalizing nonsense is this?