• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Technologically speaking, easy.

      A - system turns off

      B - new speed becomes the current limit

      C - reported/ticket/vehicle is disabled.

      • @Zron
        link
        91 year ago

        So in my town there’s a speed trap that goes from 45 to 30, downhill. I slow down gradually especially when there’s snow.

        Will this system communicate such things to the car? Or will the car automatically stomp on the breaks and potentially cause a spin out or collision?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          My assumption would it be would work by limiting acceleration rather than enforced braking which could be dangerous. But we’ll have to see what system they come up with.

          I think this has almost no chance of becoming law anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not limiting it is already a safety issue. It’s almost unthinkable that these situations would be more frequent or dangerous than speeding already is. But I’m curious what scenarios you are referring to. I can’t think of anything that is likely to happen with any regularity.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                “But what if there’s a nuclear attack followed by a tsunami!?!” vs. “speeding drivers regularly kill people”. These aren’t legit worries people have, they’re excuses because they regularly speed and get upset that they might be compelled not to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I’m not talking about autopilot. It’s your job, as it is today, to reduce your speed BEFORE the limit change.