The fellows called Ackman a “genocide apologist.”

      • PatFusty
        link
        fedilink
        -9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know you get your comments removed by mods if you say “it’s not a genocide” and they label as misinformation lmfao.

        It’s just not. Nobody thinks that outside of Africa’s league of corrupted nations. I’ll agree that this is misinformation when the non Arabic countries sending Palestine foreign aid consider it genocide. When you can get Justin Trudeau to say it’s a genocide then I’ll change my mind.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Well the ICJ just decided that there’s a case against Israel, so, despite your racist rant, it’s not just Africa that thinks that Israel actions might fall under the definition of genocide.

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sorry you are right I shouldn’t have said Africa’s corrupted nations. I should have said BRICS and other axis of evil nation states instead.

            But anyways, nobody gives a flying fuck about any ruling coming from the ICJ especially if the EU is not backing it.

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            Would you prefer Biden? Macron? Scholz? They all don’t call it a genocide. Who is calling it a genocide? The Arab league signed up to call it a genocide as a whole but does al-Sisi even call it a genocide? Does the king of Saudi call it a genocide?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Most world leaders also don’t call the Armenian genocide, genocide despite the fact the word was coined to describe it, and you have plenty of examples of genocide after WW2 that were tolerated by the international community. International politics are not a good court, because governments by their own nature tend to focus on what’s expedient for the national interests and not in what’s right.

              Edit: I just remembered a particularly nasty one, remember when the western world and China decided to support the Khmer Rouge and the Cambodian Genocide (and before you go full denialist on this one, it was classified as such by an international court).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I don’t have a preference. I was, and still am, just curious why Justin Trudeau?

              Now I am also why you listed all the others you listed as well?

              • PatFusty
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Idunno maybe because they are leaders of major countries involved. I listed Trudeau as a notable left leaning western leader who does not agree with this agenda.

                Why is South Africa championing a genocide ICJ case for Palestinians?