• TheHarpyEagle
    link
    64 months ago

    Yeah, but in those cases, no one would say “we don’t need a cure.”

    • @hansl
      link
      74 months ago

      I disagree. There are definitely people who would be “you just need to control it, no need to change it”. Which is why Storm is portrayed like that. It’s a lack of empathy.

      • TheHarpyEagle
        link
        34 months ago

        I suppose it depends on how the scene puts delivered. If it is portrayed as a lack of empathy or just understanding, then yes I absolutely agree it’s realistic. If it’s portrayed as an empowering moment, that’s where we run into issues.

        From distant memory, it was the latter, but I’m trying to find clips that put it in context. Let me know if you find one.

    • Bonehead
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Tell that to the gay kid in the 80s during the AIDS crysis when everyone was scared of gay people, who just wanted the thing that makes everyone hate them just go away.

      • TheHarpyEagle
        link
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        But there’s a difference here. Yes there is a parallel to the AIDS epidemic here, but the difference is that the panic surrounding those with AIDS was unfounded and steeped in bigotry, while the fear of being killed by touching Rouge is very real.

        Like, no it’s not a moral failing to have AIDS, but that doesn’t mean the incredible advancements we’ve made in HIV treatment are a bad thing.

        To be clear, Rogue is still absolutely valid as a character who struggles with an innate affliction that is, for perceived or misguided reasons, considered dangerous. There’s definitely parallels to conversion therapy and the like. But the analogy to the persecution of marginalized groups is just broad enough to contain both those whose identity is the “disease” (Storm) and those whose identity is tied to but not synonymous with their affliction (Rogue). It’s the distinction that makes this particular line hit just a bit off the mark. Conversion therapy vs AZT, as it were.

        • Bonehead
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Whether the threat is real or perceived, the end result is the exact same. Society blames a particular trait shared by a group of people even though a very small percentage of those people pose any sort of threat due to that trait. Gay people were literally killed because of that perceived threat. And often no one was punished.

          You also have to remember the time when this movie was released. Gay people had only just started being accepted, and there was a concerted effort by certain religious groups to try to derail any legal recognition of gay people. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell was still a very real thing in the military. The entire trilogy is an allegory for gay people. The original comics may have been about race, but these movies were for a different audience. It was a commentary on exactly what was happening during that time.

          You can criticize the sloppy writing of the third movie, but don’t dismiss the efforts by people trying to get a message across to the general population.