Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt and Newsmax host Carl Higbie mused Thursday about a potential “force-on-force” conflict between Texas and the Biden Administration after the Supreme Court ruled against the state’s Republican governor by declaring that federal agents can remove razor wire laid along the border with Mexico.

Higbie began by telling Stitt that “there’s rumblings that Joe Biden should or may actually federalize the National Guard—take that power away from Greg Abbott.”

Stitt called the situation, which has so far seen several migrant deaths,“very weird”—while adding that clash is currently a “powder keg of tension.”

“We certainly stand with Texas on the right to defend themselves,” he said. “But Biden is going to be in a tough situation. So in other words, he’s going to try to federalize these troops—in other words, put them on federal orders. And so now, their allegiance technically goes to the president of the United States instead of the governor.”

The dispute between Texas and the federal government has been compared to the situation that led President Dwight Eisenhower to federalize the Arkansas National Guard—part of his bid to allow Black students to attend a Little Rock public high school against the wishes of the then-segregationist governor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      True, but not every person that holds an ideology is a leader that can or is willing to take up the torch.

      For example, if Trump died tomorrow from a stroke, the maga ideology would survive, but there are few in the cult who can be the new Donald Trump; they simply don’t have the charisma needed (not that they wouldn’t try, of course).

      Fundigelicalism and white supremacy would still exist, as they have for a long time, but the glue that’s held them together is their deification of Trump. Without him, they lose that cohesion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      Yes but those officers and leaders went on to positions of power that shaped the resultant decades, leading to many inequalities and issues we see today. (not all).

      Leading an insurrection and civil war should at minimum bar you from any public or political action from then on.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Leading an insurrection and civil war should at minimum bar you from any public or political action from then on.

        It would if the 14th amendment was taken as more than a polite suggestion.