I’m fairly new and don’t 100% understand it yet, but instances are run on servers that require money. Are we heading towards seeing ads or subscriptions to raise funds instead of relying on donations to cover overhead?

Especially with the influx of new users. Hardware upgrades are needed.

  • donchez
    link
    371 year ago

    As soon as Lemmy instances are unsustainable out of pure interest for the concept of the Fediverse. I doubt there will be subscriptions, first it’ll be donations, and then some instances may have ads. It’s an inevitable that both will happen (either on the same instance, or some instances opting for donations to stay up, and others opting for ads to stay up). No one can run the servers necessary for this platform out of pure charity; the bill for the Fediverse is going to be due someday, and it has to be paid.

    • @trifictional
      link
      451 year ago

      But it’s sustainable if it’s non profit.

      Most third party Reddit users were happy to pay in the range of $5 a month. The reason everything is shutting down now is because they don’t just want to break even, they want profit, and a shit ton at that.

      The fediverse makes social media non-profit by default which means that we can all share the cost.

      Wikipedia is one of the largest websites in the world and is still non-profit. It shows that it’s sustainable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Exactly right. I never had a problem with Reddit wanting to make money for their services. If you give me exactly what I want, I will pay.

      • @youtherealmvp1
        link
        41 year ago

        But even non-profits have costs that they need to cover somehow. If they don’t, they’re still not sustainable.

          • @Aux
            link
            21 year ago

            If something is free then 99% of users won’t spend a penny. Anyone who ever did any business knows that. You either make 1% pay for everyone (just like “free” games on mobile phones do), force everyone into subscription or sell your users to advertisers. Choose your poison.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              Yes, but that’s not the point.

              The point is to keep the servers relatively small so that the non profits can keep breaking even on nothing but donations, even with an influx of new users entering the fediverse.- bigger instances should ideally only be trying to grow when their donations are more than covering the costs. (That being said I wouldn’t be surprised if the bigger instances started having problems what with their seeming ability to continually accept new users without closing once)

              In the grand scheme of things the bigger instances having 20K users isn’t a whole lot, and can be done using smaller servers - the thing with social media is that usually only about 20-25% of people are actually “active” - the rest are lurking or dead accounts and maybe occasionally commenting.

              The smaller instances (like the one Im on) have anywhere from 1-1000 users and are highly unlikely to fall outside the range of the low cost of a little bit higher than a hobbyist side project, and what with the tendency for smaller instances to have more % of their members also be donators probably never have to fear running out of money

              It really only becomes an exponentially expensive problem when you reach twitter and Reddit levels of users on the same instance - as you end up needing more and more expensive custom load balancing and caching solutions in order to keep up with the demand - basically it’s more sustainable for a few thousand people to support the costs of a 1000 instances with 100,000 total members than it is for a company to try to make a profit off of a single monolithic structure supporting the same number of users.

              The fediverse splits this load across servers, even segregates it. There are areas of the fediverse that I will never see due to a lack of direct connection through the nature of how your feed works, this helps as not everything is needlessly routed through a single point.

              Also Wikipedia faces the same issues and still manages to get through - sure they put up banners asking for donations when margins are getting in to what they consider the “danger zone” but usually the danger zone is more than what’s required.

              • Basically they always over budget so they never go under.
              • ALERT
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I’m wondering whether I would do good or bad if I host my own Lemmy instance for myself, to lower my impact on other instances.

          • @douglasg14b
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s sustainable for now, because instances are microscope. If at some point in time we expect lemmy to become a mainstream platform for communication with tens or hundreds of millions of users in their respective communities. It will become unsustainable long long before then IMHO (I’m happy to be wrong only time will tell)

            The cost/user for Lemmy instances is through the roof, and the grand majority of people will not be willing to make donations. Perhaps awards like what Reddit did is a good option?

            What about longevity. Who is going to pay for the storage for the hundreds of petabytes of storage for comment and media history? What about replication between instances? Do you have a retention period and delete history, losing knowledge to time?

            I worry :/

            Edit:

            Maybe I worry too much, but now after Reddit maybe I’m just gunshy and am afraid of finding and contributing to new communities that end up being wiped due to sustainability issues.

            I hope this problem gets solved, or worked around in some capacity.

        • @jimbo
          link
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        They also wanted control over the user base, so they could do more intrusive bullshit to push more ads onto users. With the fediverse there’s no monopoly on the platform so no one instance can get full control and abuse their power. With Reddit the only choice was to either submit or leave completely. With Lemmy all you need to do is swap instances.

        • ALERT
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          If only you could save all your user activity along with swapping the instance… But as I understood, this is not implemented yet.

      • @PsychedSy
        link
        11 year ago

        But it’s sustainable if it’s non profit.

        I think this is something that’s hard to organize with our current economic system, but very much worth experimenting with.

        The neat thing is we can try any concept we can dream up and federate. People can run through funding concepts and structures and failure isn’t all that bad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Im still wrapping my head around the concept but FOR EXAMPLE could someone create an instance that requires a subscription fee, link it to their own app (like a retooled RIF) and offer a curated and managed experience?

          Vs

          Join a free instance, use what free software you want and have to figure out the nuts and bolts yourself?

          • @PsychedSy
            link
            31 year ago

            Each federated instance can have their own requirements for signing up, so they should be able to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Oh then thats absolutely where I see Lemmy going if its a success. Give it 10 years and people will know their app or their managed instance and have no clue what Lemmy is.

              • @PsychedSy
                link
                11 year ago

                In the root comment or the one that started this I mentioned a downside. Fast iterating paid instances can gain from larger federated instances without returning value. There needs to be a method to share bandwidth, processor time, and/or value.

                The great bit is we’re all now part of this expirament!

        • @jimbo
          link
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • Mike D.
      link
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Donations are already happening in the Fediverse. Lemmy,world is funded by donations to the Mastodon.world instance. Many Mastodon users donate to their instance. I give $3 per month to my instance (sfba.social). They put out a quarterly report breaking down how much cam in and went out.

      I donate in order to have an ad-free experience. If the admins separate the finances of Lemmy.world and Mastodon.world I will donate here as well.

    • @douglasg14b
      link
      61 year ago

      This is inevitable as well.

      A user base as large as Reddit has an infra bill in the tens of millions. And that’s mature, with cost optimization at all levels to reduce compute, static content costs, more effective caching…etc

      Lemmy instances are probably an order of magnitude more expensive to run on a per-user basis, at least.

      This means the bill for the Lemmy fediverse if it had the active user base of reddit could be conceivably be near or over a collective $100mill/y with the majority of that just being a result of fragmented, high cost, infrastructure running a (at scale) low performance application.

      • @Klear
        link
        61 year ago

        That’s easy to fix. There’s a ton of new fediverse apps popping up. Just charge them an API fee.

        • @JackGreenEarth
          link
          21 year ago

          You can’t do that, the fediverse and Lemmy software doesn’t work that way.

          • @PsychedSy
            link
            21 year ago

            What about some sort of equity load balancing shenanigans? Small instances take on some load roughly equivalent to what they use from other instances or something. In another comment I was talking about funding instances and being able to rapidly iterate funding methods. One issue is they get value from the federation, so contributing all or some portion of what you use may be fitting.

      • @_kato
        link
        31 year ago

        The cost will be spread out on an instance by instance basis due to which the cost per user will be low and if not they can also host their own instance which doesn’t cost a lot. If it’s something around $5 a month I wouldn’t mind paying to support a service I plan on using everyday.

        • @douglasg14b
          link
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s not how cost/user works. The cost/user actually goes UP the more small instances you have as a result of more expensive, smaller scale, and severely less optimized infrastructure. Infrastructure gets cheaper on a per-user basis as it consolidates, there are lots of technical reasons for this, but it can be summed up with scale (infra per “unit” is cheaper the more you can guarantee you’ll use, and LOTS of cost optimization paths open up the larger you get).

          My point is that the community is going to hit a growth barrier, and that barrier is money and efficiency. Would you be willing to donate $5/m to 50-100 instances? Since to support that kind of scale they would need to whittle down to one instance per community for large communities, and massive communities (think 10-50 million users) might not even be able to exist with the current Lemmy hosting model. I wonder if even 1-5million user communities would even function without dedicated engineering to support the infrastructure and custom tools/services to make it work.

          …etc

          It’s a real problem. One that will be felt sooner than you might think, and one that will limit the growth, stability, and longevity of communities.

          • drphungky
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Tl;Dr: economies of scale are an economic reality. Lemmy will likely go like email, with large centralized private companies running the most popular servers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If anyone puts ads on an instance it’s not really a good encouragement for someone to join, and what with the nature of the fediverse it’s more likely to make people try finding a better deal elsewhere.

      I would definitely move to a different instance if my instance started using ads to fund itself - I’d rather the instance mandated a subscription than doing that.

      Also another thing to consider is how other instances started spewing ads all over the fediverse - the ones that have managed to get by without advertising would probably defederate from those that did so that they don’t end up showing another instances ads. Meaning it makes no sense to support ads in the first place if you want to stay federated.

      That said if it got so unsustainable that I had to pay a subscription I would probably consider moving to a smaller instance anyway or hosting one myself for myself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Of course, but the important part is you have choice and instances will keep each other in check because you can always switch. With a centralized system like Reddit there’s only one provider and if you don’t use them you’re locked out of the system entirely. This gives them a monopoly on the platform and the power to do anti user bullshit.

      Email is also a protocol with distributed servers and compared to that I think each fediverse instance has far less lock in. With email I can switch providers but it’s a big hassle to have to change all my accounts and tell people to use the new address and set up forwarding etc. With my Lemmy account I don’t really care that much about my user history since it’s all anonymous anyways and it’s not connected to anything that’s central to my life so if I have to switch instances it’s not a big deal. It would be nice to have some kind of account linking to show that the different instance accounts belong to the same person, and that should definitely be possible to implement, but honestly it’s not even that big of a deal to me.