Russia’s science and higher education ministry has dismissed the head of a prestigious genetics institute who sparked controversy by contending that humans once lived for centuries and that the shorter lives of modern humans are due to their ancestors’ sins, state news agency RIA-Novosti said Thursday.

Although the report did not give a reason for the firing of Alexander Kudryavtsev, the influential Russian Orthodox Church called it religious discrimination.

Kudryavtsev, who headed the Russian Academy of Science’s Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, made a presentation at a conference in 2023 in which he said people had lived for some 900 years prior to the era of the Biblical Flood and that “original, ancestral and personal sins” caused genetic diseases that shortened lifespans.

    • @APassenger
      link
      English
      30
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s quite literally in the Bible. People are stated as having extraordinary lifespans (e. g., Methuselah).

      Then there was a flood after which people saw a rainbow for the first time ever. Gods promise not to flood us again.

      The implication seems to be that the earth was in a firmament bubble and the bubble burst, sending down water. Then we had direct sun and not the filtered kind that He* created us for.

      No longer in our best element, we die earlier.

      I’m not saying the above is true, I’m saying I’ve heard this for decades now and it checks out against biblical description.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 months ago

        And this is why, while you can have smart Christians, you really can’t have smart biblical literalist.

      • jaxxed
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        Can you give a reference please? Sounds like sermon quoting to me, they tend to have a ranting quality to them.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              510 months ago

              Yeah, there are entire books in the OT dedicated to lineage, and I’m pretty sure it’s all been debunked. It’s not a historical document in any way whatsoever.

              • @LesserAbe
                link
                English
                -110 months ago

                Lol I mean how do you debunk something that wasn’t originally intended to be a scientific document. (I know that’s not the mindset among Christians)

                • @afraid_of_zombies
                  link
                  English
                  210 months ago

                  Ok it has been debunked because the events described are often not only internally inconsistent they do not match up with what we now know. And before you start on “it’s an analogy” keep in mind it wasn’t for the people who wrote it and lived with it as well as the confusion of what it is an analogy for.

                  • @LesserAbe
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Sorry, think you mistook me. I’m saying debunking is something you do witth certain genres of material and not others. We might debunk a news report or a biography or a scientific study. We don’t debunk a novel or TV show or a campfire story.

                    I got a few credit hours away from being a bible major before I dropped it and eventually became an atheist. Our biblical interpretation professor started the first class by saying, “whether the six days in which God created the earth are literal or metaphorical doesn’t matter.” He said the Bible was not written to be a textbook, it started as an oral tradition which was later written down, and it’s purpose was to describe a people’s identity, where they fit in the universe and what they should do.

                    You’re right to say the genealogy is not historically accurate, I was just saying it’s not something it really makes sense to say was debunked.

        • @APassenger
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          Genesis 6 through 9.

          You’re asking me to provide a reference for the biblical flood story. When I say it’s in there… It’s in there.

          I get that you don’t know me, but the second sentence of your post isn’t helpful.

            • @APassenger
              link
              English
              110 months ago

              Doesn’t matter, it’s in there. Even feeble attempts to find it using a search engine surface that theory.

              I’ve done it a few times today. Each with less than 2 minutes spent.

    • @Psythik
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So you mean to tell me that you’re weren’t raised by hardcore Christians who drilled this “fact” down your throat well into adulthood? And that it’s our fault for being sinners so we can’t live 969 years anymore?

      You’re lucky son of a bitch, you know that, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        I was having a normal conversation with a coworker about life expectancy rising medical advancedments and what not, she pivots and says yea in the bible people lived for like a thousand years. I was just like yeah haha

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      Listen. It’s not that hard. A flood happens and now we have nearly 1/10th the lifespan.

      DONT YOU GET IT?!

      /s