@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months ago#sciencemander.xyzimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1677arrow-down131
arrow-up1646arrow-down1image#sciencemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareivanafteralllinkfedilink69•8 months agoRandom online scientist here to tell you: this study has deep flaws. Among them, the way it was conducted and its outcomes. This is for various technical reasons you wouldn’t really understand.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoAs a random commenter, clearly the sample size is too small and they mixed up correlation and causation
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoThe contribution to the community is weak. I recommend the authors to work on their study design and to basically redo everything in good.
Random online scientist here to tell you: this study has deep flaws. Among them, the way it was conducted and its outcomes. This is for various technical reasons you wouldn’t really understand.
You must be tenured.
As a random commenter, clearly the sample size is too small and they mixed up correlation and causation
The contribution to the community is weak. I recommend the authors to work on their study design and to basically redo everything in good.