• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      The first explicitly states its conjecture. In reality, it’s much more likely in my mind that Mozilla is not well suited to fast paced changes like the recent YouTube cat and mouse Adblock saga. Imagine if you were waiting not for an extension update, but a browser update.

      The second isn’t even about Mozilla. They rely on Google for the anti phishing list. Is there a free and open alternative? I legitimately can’t find one. I can find paid alternatives, but I doubt users would be willing to pay.

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        I believe these are reasonable examples of slightly bending of Mozillas knee to Google, as requested.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  Such as?

                  Like, you’re pretty clear about not using Google. The question is, what service exists that is within their ability to pay (free)?

                  “They shouldn’t use google” is a fine argument, assuming it’s possible to stop using google without incurring huge fees and/or removing the functionality completely.

                  • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                    link
                    English
                    111 months ago

                    Why assume they won’t pay?

                    Even for free they could support something like openphish.com and help it grow and maybe outclass Google.

                    The point is that we don’t know the details of their agreement, nor the unwritten rules to guarantee continued support.