What’s Debian based on again? I think it was some earlier variant of Ubuntu

/s

  • @TheInsane42
    link
    English
    311 months ago

    Ubuntu has been around for 2 decades (close nough, octobet it’s 2 decades) and yes, Debian is 11 year older and now known for it’s desktop friendly use. That Debian caught up in the last decade is about time, but to late for the major population who want linux but not the hassle of manually configure the graphics environment.

    To be honest, I see that most people of 30 and younger don’t know or care how a computer (or anything) works, it just works.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      Then they don’t need to use Debian. There are plenty of user friendly options. Debians installer is kind of bad but that doesn’t mean Debian is bad.

      • @TheInsane42
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        What is bad about it? It’s as fool proof as the RedHat installer, unless you go to the expert text mode one. (And even that is pretty straight forward)

          • @TheInsane42
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            Why would you want to disable root?

            Remote root login is disabled by default, local root disabeling is useless anyway, as when you have acdess to the physical system you can break it open anyway.

              • @TheInsane42
                link
                English
                111 months ago

                It’s a better way, but not fool proof. I always keep root available for console login. (Saves booting from external media when there is an issue) For the rest, sudo is perfect though, but it doesn’t replace root login in 100% of the situations.