• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago
    1. Hamas is not taking part in Eurovision.
    2. A war crime is a war crime and a genocide is a genocide, no matter the justification.
    3. Calling Hammas the aggressor ignores quite a bit of complicated history.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hamas is the aggressor in this specific part of the almost 100 year old conflict, that resulted in the current circumstances.

      What genocide are you referring to?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        None in particular, I’m saying there is no excuse for genocide. So to determine if Israel is committing one, the actions of Hamas are irrelevant.

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Well, if you cut it like that, you could cut it a month later. Now Israel is the aggressor!

        It’s not that simple.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        By that logic the specific part of the current genocide in Gaza Israel is the unambiguous aggressor.

        Like: You cannot just ignore what came before. WTF?

      • ???
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        “Conflict” makes it sound like a dispute. Let’s call it what REALLT is: apartheid, occupation, and ethnic cleansing.