The way these articles are written is designed to invoke anger. They repeat past events as if they happened yesterday and provide little information.
Anyway, curious that "Hamas claimed the three men as members, calling the operation “a cowardly assassination.” " is missing from the Al Jazeera article. It’s a damn mystery, I tell you.
The greater mystery is why you failed to mention this line from the AJ article
“Hamas confirmed that Jalamneh was one of its members. The Jenin Brigade, which includes a number of Palestinian armed resistance groups, said in a statement that two of the three men were members of Islamic Jihad.”
The way these articles are written is designed to invoke anger. They repeat past events as if they happened yesterday and provide little information.
Anyway, curious that "Hamas claimed the three men as members, calling the operation “a cowardly assassination.” " is missing from the Al Jazeera article. It’s a damn mystery, I tell you.
The greater mystery is why you failed to mention this line from the AJ article
“Hamas confirmed that Jalamneh was one of its members. The Jenin Brigade, which includes a number of Palestinian armed resistance groups, said in a statement that two of the three men were members of Islamic Jihad.”
Because I didn’t see it.
I guess next time read the article before you criticize it
Nah. Al Jazeera still reads like a screaming child.
At least they can read!
Oh snap, I guess Al Jazeera is the perfect website for you!