You missed my point entirely. I’m not defending Rump. I’m saying we should use the things he’s actually done-- like those you listed-- as our ammunition.
Which I just did. He doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt in Haley’s circumstance, because in short order I’ll be able to add “man arrested and charged for swatting Presidential candidate” to the list.
The Republican Party should distance themselves from a man who clearly has a dangerous following and who has shown no scruples in encouraging them to embrace violence.
Anything else you’re claiming I’m saying, or that you’re finding between the lines, is a misrepresentation of what I’m actually writing in plain English.
You missed my point entirely. I’m not defending Rump. I’m saying we should use the things he’s actually done-- like those you listed-- as our ammunition.
Which I just did. He doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt in Haley’s circumstance, because in short order I’ll be able to add “man arrested and charged for swatting Presidential candidate” to the list.
That’s not what you did, but whatever. I’m not going to waste both of our time arguing about this.
The Republican Party should distance themselves from a man who clearly has a dangerous following and who has shown no scruples in encouraging them to embrace violence.
Anything else you’re claiming I’m saying, or that you’re finding between the lines, is a misrepresentation of what I’m actually writing in plain English.
Now that I agree with.
It’s literally a paraphrase of the first comment I wrote in this thread.