Justin Mohn, a 32-year-old Pennsylvania man, is in police custody after allegedly murdering and decapitating his father, claiming the latter was a “federal employee” and a “traitor.” Before his arrest, Mohn posted a 14-minute video to YouTube in which he displayed his father’s severed head, proclaiming: "This is the head of Mike Mohn, a federal

  • @MataVatnik
    link
    -2810 months ago

    What I’m saying is that if you are asking a question that pigeonholes people into two categories sometimes they pick the worst one out of spite. It’s not really am indicator of what that person believes. Kinda like saying if you don’t support BLM you’re a racist, and guess what happened? A bunch of people started saying “well I guess I’m a racist now”

    • @Cosmonauticus
      link
      3410 months ago

      Kinda like saying if you don’t support BLM you’re a racist

      No it’s not the same. A better equivalent would be are you racist or anti-racist. Are you pro or anti rape. Are you pro or anti slavery.

      Facism is defined as a violently oppressive form of government. It shouldn’t be a hard question if you’re not a piece of shit

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        -810 months ago

        If you read Ibram X Kendi’s treatise on anti-racism you’d know that example is not helping your argument

    • Flying Squid
      link
      2610 months ago

      and guess what happened? A bunch of people started saying “well I guess I’m a racist now”

      They were always racists. They just decided it was okay to admit it.

      • @EmpathicVagrant
        link
        1210 months ago

        “Whoopsie I got caught guess I’ll quit hiding it.”

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        -610 months ago

        The reason I brought up the Palestine Israel example was because it was a real question in a survey (NYT I think?), more that 50% of the people under 30 responded they support Hamas and under 20 years old it was as high as 70%. By your logic, all of these people are terrorist, and always have been.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          710 months ago

          Please show how that is my logic. Do those people all call themselves racists?

          • @MataVatnik
            link
            -410 months ago

            No, they call themselves pro Hamas. At least in that survey, but I doubt they actually believe it, more likely they picked that answered because they were pigeonholed.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              810 months ago

              What does that have to do with your spurious claim that people call themselves racists out of spite and not because they’re racists?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              610 months ago

              What at all does that have to do with being a fascist or an anti-fascist? A shitty survey asking people which of two awful groups of people they prefer is not at all the same as asking what one’s opinion on fascism is.

              Fascism is very clearly defined. There is no pigeonholing here, there is no third option being left off the table like there was in that survey. You’re either in favor of fascism, actively by supporting it or passively by not resisting it, or you are anti-fascist and resisting the rise of fascism to the best of your abilities. There is no in-between.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      24
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      BLM is a specific organization. Fascism is an ideology. It’s more like saying if you’re not for civil rights you’re a racist.

      But really, you’re spending a lot of time and energy trying to explain why you’re, at best, neutral on fascism.

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        -710 months ago

        No, I’m spending energy trying to explain to an echo chamber that forcing people to take binary extreme positions forces neutral people to take extreme positions. It’s a matter of politics and getting policy passed, if you call a neutral person a fascist, the will not vote with you. Calling people names is not a way to get their support. I can tell that people really have not learned anything these past 8 years. A lot of Trump support in 2016 came from exactly this type of rhetorical mechanisms. You want to keep on going this way? Go ahead, but you will not get the support you need, but at the end of the day you can just say those people were fascists and racists anyways, right? Extremely convenient

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          1110 months ago

          You think being against fascism is extreme? That should be a baseline position.

          And I’m not going to coddle Trump supporters just because they act like contrarian children when they get called out.

          If some anonymous nobody on the Internet is making you support Trump or embrace hate because they said something you didn’t like or called you a mean name and you want to pwn them, you were just looking for a reason to support it anyway and need to grow the fuck up.

          • @MataVatnik
            link
            -510 months ago

            You and I both know that the term “Anti-fascist” carries a lot more meaning than simply being against fascism. If you were to frame the question “Are you for or against fascism” you’d probably would get a more accurate answer

            • @AbidanYre
              link
              English
              510 months ago

              So now you’re going to argue linguistics as a reason to not come out against fascism? That’s really just supporting my stance of “grow the fuck up already.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      If they pick fascist ‘to spite’ me they’re very clearly in that camp. Not because the question was asked but because of their intent in answering.