‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
News writers this time. It’s hilarious how much weight this days has in the reputation of a person that some freak like Zuckerberg or Musk decides to ban you from his playground.
12 y. ago that argumentation would’ve been a joke.
‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
Whom are you criticizing? News writers? Tate? What argument is occurring?
News writers this time. It’s hilarious how much weight this days has in the reputation of a person that some freak like Zuckerberg or Musk decides to ban you from his playground.
12 y. ago that argumentation would’ve been a joke.
What’s the argument here?