• Derin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    What about people who want to play multiplayer games? Like, when I play Counterstrike in a ranked fashion I sort of expect the service part… Same for games like Overwatch, Valorant, Dota, League, etc.

    I feel like you’re missing a clarification of “No one wants Always Online or GaaS in single player or coop titles”?

    • @Duamerthrax
      link
      English
      1310 months ago

      I’d prefer it release with modding tools so the community could make maps and skins. I’d also prefer it to release with the ability to host my own server. I also don’t give a shit about meaningless ranking. All this shit is a poison pill for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Every game should have this tbh. A lot of the big genres and games in recent years came from literally this. Modern mobas and battleroyals come to mind .

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Instead what we have is Epic delisting all the Unreal and Unreal Tournament games from all the stores and shutting down the master servers for the multiplayer games. There was a time when games were going to be restricted, but managed to survive on the basis that they were art and therefor protected under free speech laws. You can’t even get American McGee’s Alice legally anymore and it was absolutely art created by masters of the engine at that point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      Well yeah. Games that are inherently multi-player and not split screen and feature an aspect of matchmaking are obviously fine to be always online games as a service.

      Although personally the games-as-a-service model is something I avoid even in those. Overwatch was made objectively worse when it went from the buy-once model to the pay-once-a-season-or-you-dont-get-the-new-hero model. Mauga is completely busted right now and every new introduction of a hero since 2 launched has felt exactly like this-- busted while paid-only players have access and then fixed after the free players get a chance.

      It’s the model. Squeezing money out of players is slowly killing even multi-player games like Overwatch.

      It’s completely and utterly unacceptable for single player games.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Pretty much any GAAS MP game would be better as a self-hostable game. Even ranked matchups can work well that way.

        Games are designed around GAAS not because of the design of the same, but the profit model. GAAS is there to sell cosmetics and whatnot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You’re right. It is a matter of perspective though. For the actual players, absolutely. It’s always better to have self hosted matches and control the content yourself. But even in my example above, Overwatch could not sustain itself as a studio on the buy-once model, even with loot boxes. I still think they’re doing it wrong and it fucking sucks, but the buy-once model lead to a developmentally dead game for a few years.

          From game dev perspective, having a model that makes money over time allows the game to continue being updated without investment from outside sources.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            You can get money over time with the traditional model, just release content DLCs. I’ve spent hundreds on EU4 over the years, and I just treat their DLCs as buying a new game since it freshens up the experience for me. For MP, players get access to whatever DLC the host has, which works really well.

            Overwatch could totally do that as well. DLCs could have:

            • playable characters/classes
            • game modes
            • maps/settings
            • SP campaigns

            Nothing about the game requires an evergreen format. Some games do, such as CCGs like Hearthstone and Magic: Arena since they have frequent card releases and the games are designed around scarcity, but most of these don’t.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              I don’t disagree with you. All I was really saying was that Overwatch specifically wasn’t making money with its model

    • @Bartsbigbugbag
      link
      English
      1010 months ago

      When I played counter strike I expected no such thing. If I wanted skins, I could go get them for free on csbanana. I expected nothing more than a game and a dedicated server client. The rest was provided by the community.

    • @Woht24
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      Hmmmm no, no one wants always online on anything. Why should you ever have a piece of your property that has no use without an internet connection?

      At the very least, you should be about to play against bots offline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Well, I’m sure there are plenty out there that do want multiplayer only games.

      Personally I avoid them like the plague. I would love it if Valorant, overwatch, etc came with a single player campaign that could be played offline, or an option to play against bots.

      I hate people. Especially random competitive online people.