• @gornius
      link
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What?

      It’s simple and readable. You literally put somebody that has never coded in their life, show them the YAML file and they will probably get it. Worked both with my boss and my girlfriend.

      In Toml there are too many ways to do the same thing, which I don’t like. Also unless you know it deeply, you have no idea how the underlying data structure is going to look.

        • BarrierWithAshes
          link
          fedilink
          610 months ago

          Wow. I’ve never used yaml or even looked at it but damn that is horrid. Why do people even use this? JSON and XML are so better.

          • snoweM
            link
            fedilink
            810 months ago

            Because no one ever uses those. Literally > and | are the only ones I’ve ever seen in over a decade and you will never need to worry about the differences between the two.

            XML as a configuration language is terrible. Yaml gets the point across in an easily readable way, which is exactly the point. Same for JSON except JSON you can’t even use comments (you need json5 or one of the numerous other alternatives to get those).

          • Eager Eagle
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s really unfortunate the devops world chose such a hot mess of a format. Extending JSON with comments would be a dumb choice and still do a better job for most config files.

            noyaml.com

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      Yaml is already pretty popular, so I don’t think 927 applies here. It’s actually more common in newer projects than toml.

      Which begs the question, should I go with the flow or is there good reason to go with toml?