• haui
    link
    fedilink
    -310 months ago

    We have another one.

    Slavery used to be legal. So it was okay?

    Right now „selling“ stuff and saying its just a license you fool is legal so it is okay?

    • @TAYRN
      link
      610 months ago

      That is a false equivalence, and I think you know that.

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        -310 months ago

        Feel free to point out where because thats exactly what people mean by the phrase in the post.

        • @TAYRN
          link
          610 months ago

          Comparing slavery to purchasing digital media might be a good place to start.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Its unimportant which example you use.

            The underlying principle is legal ≠ correct. Just because something is legal, its not necessarily morally or otherwise correct.

            Selling a movie to someone and calling it a license is highly manipulative and I think you know that.

            • @TAYRN
              link
              610 months ago

              Yes, I said from the start that it might not be moral.

              But that’s exactly the point: companies sell movies to theaters, and then those theaters sell tickets to each viewer. That’s the license they each agreed to. A theater buying a movie off Amazon and then selling tickets to everyone who watched it would probably make some people upset, and would very clearly be illegal.

              • haui
                link
                fedilink
                -210 months ago

                Talk about mental gymnastics.

                You cant sell a limited time license. That is rent, plain and simple. If you pay 3 years rent at once or monthly, its still rent.

                If you pay for something and have to give it back, you dont actually become the „owner“.

                And thats why people say if buying isnt owning, piracy isnt theft, plain and simple.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  Renting generally refers to physical goods, with the following property: when it’s being used by one party, it’s unavailable to everyone else.

                  For intellectual property, things that can be used by N people without interference between them, the term limited license is correct.

                  • haui
                    link
                    fedilink
                    210 months ago

                    Its still manipulative to call it „selling“ or „owning“.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      What’s funny about your bad equivalency is that pirating is treating the people who created the content as slaves since you’re enjoying the fruit of their labour without compensating them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        This user you interacted with here, went on to describe this conversation as you “abusing” and “manipulating” them. They claimed that you were a troll, and started a huge thread in the Fediverse community about expanding ban powers and purging the world of people they disagree with.

        My god it’s a discussion thread on the internet, with two people disagreeing. This is what they consider trolling and abuse now.

        Look at how they responded to you disagreeing with them: https://lemmy.giftedmc.com/post/204629

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        -110 months ago

        And another one. There are a lot more and better ways to compensate an artist than giving money to record companies.

        Besides that, I‘m not saying dont buy artistic work, I‘m saying please pirate products of companies that try to bullshit their customers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          Ok, realistically, how many pirates turn around and send money to the creators, making sure that all the people involved in the creation of the content are compensated for their work?

          You don’t want to admit it but in the end you’re still taking money from the creators and if everyone was doing that then no one would create content.

          I hope pirates are happy that some people keep paying for shit.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            -310 months ago

            You‘re not answering my comment but repeating a set of beliefs. If you want to discuss stuff, feel free to. Otherwise kindly move along.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              You’re saying there are better ways to compensate the creators, I’m saying no pirates do it, especially not in a way that would make them legally allowed to have a copy of the creators’ work.

              If you don’t want to buy a CD because you don’t want the record label to profit from your purchase and you instead buy a t-shirt and go see a show, it doesn’t give you the right to have a digital copy of the artist’s songs. What you bought is the right to see a show and to own a t-shirt and downloading a copy of their album is still taking money from the artists and all the people that worked on it.

              • haui
                link
                fedilink
                -210 months ago

                Referencing one point of my many arguments is not a discussion.

                „Selling“ limited licences should be illegal but isnt. Legal does (evidently) not mean morally or otherwise okay. Supporting artists does not mean buying bad products, you cant prove that no pirates buy merch or use alternative methods to support creators, therefore I‘ll just ignore your statement.

                You were the one trying to derail the topic to a cd or movie, which is not what I said.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Here’s your whole argument:

                  `And another one. There are a lot more and better ways to compensate an artist than giving money to record companies.

                  Besides that, I‘m not saying dont buy artistic work, I‘m saying please pirate products of companies that try to bullshit their customers.`

                  I’m refuting the first part (which is your main argument because the second part is just another way to say the exact same thing) and my rebuttal also covers your second point (you’re punish the creators that have nothing to do with the company that’s doing bullshit).

                  You can’t prove that pirates do compensate the creators either so your argument is moot if mine is. The only way to legally have the creators content on hand is but purchasing it (license or full ownership), no other form of compensation allows you to have those files or compensates ALL the people involved.

                  As for derailing the conversation, you’re the first one who mentioned artists and compensating them in other ways, which, if you can be honest for 30 seconds, isn’t something that exists in the video game world.

                  In the end, it’s on you to just not play games that are distributed in a way that makes you reliant on a third party. Just because you’re mad it doesn’t make it ok to enjoy the work of the people who created the games that are distributed in a way you disagree with without compensating them.

                  • haui
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -110 months ago

                    Many words for something you could have said in three sentences.

                    You obviously dont know how to prove something. I would have to prove someone has pirated something (if thats how we define pirate) and then prove they have done whatever to compensate the creator, e.g. buy merch, subscribe on patreon or otherwise send them money.

                    And no, it is not my main argument. My main argument was that calling a limited license „buying“ or „owning“ is manipulative and should be illegal, therefore pirating products from a company using these tactics is ok.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Yeah, feel free to. Always happy for one abusive person less in my lemmy experience. Reported, blocked.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              -210 months ago

              they supposedly bloced me, too.

              some people cant stand the cognitive dissonance that comes with learning they were wrong.

              • haui
                link
                fedilink
                010 months ago

                Considering that this account has never before interacted with me and immediately went there, they either used an alt or have severe issues with impulse control and abusive behavior.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          What do you call it if you work to create something for someone and that person decides that what you created is theirs for free and you don’t have a say in the matter?

          Because that’s exactly what slavery is and that’s exactly what pirates do.

          If you disagree you should mention it to your boss because I’m sure they would be very happy to know that!