@Waffelson to linuxmemes • 8 months agoIs there something you lack in Wayland but have in xorg?imagemessage-square240arrow-up1742arrow-down180
arrow-up1662arrow-down1imageIs there something you lack in Wayland but have in xorg?@Waffelson to linuxmemes • 8 months agomessage-square240
minus-square@michaelmroselink1•8 months agoGnome has decided to never support wlr-layer-shell that is 40% of your userbase right there.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•8 months agoyeah that’s weird, and I can’t really tell why, but then that’s a gnome problem not a Wayland problem. they’re explicitly choosing to not support it. I did find this though which seems to imply that it could be supported in mutter, but it’d take a fork if you wanted to implement it in gnome shell https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/973 anyway, there’s choice. if you need these features use something that supports them
minus-square@michaelmroselink1•8 months agoThis is great unless you need feature A that only X or Y and B that is only available in Z
minus-square@michaelmroselink1•8 months agoHow about I just continue to use X which will be getting security updates for the next decade and was feature complete many many years prior.
Gnome has decided to never support wlr-layer-shell that is 40% of your userbase right there.
yeah that’s weird, and I can’t really tell why, but then that’s a gnome problem not a Wayland problem. they’re explicitly choosing to not support it.
I did find this though which seems to imply that it could be supported in mutter, but it’d take a fork if you wanted to implement it in gnome shell https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/973
anyway, there’s choice. if you need these features use something that supports them
This is great unless you need feature A that only X or Y and B that is only available in Z
fork gnome then, idk what to tell you
How about I just continue to use X which will be getting security updates for the next decade and was feature complete many many years prior.