Despite it being “lovely”, it’s still on stolen Palestinian land, hence illegal.
Edit:
I read further (from the same link)
Be’eri was well known for its pro-peace sympathies: It had a special fund to give financial help to Gazans who came to the kibbutz on work permits, and kibbutzniks would often volunteer to drive sick Palestinians to an oncology center in southern Israel
That’s great though, I respect that. That changes my view on that kibbutz. I don’t agree with Hamas’ blanket statements and generalization, and have been critical of them since I was first aware of their existence and lost many friends over it.
Still, I understand why Gazans are angry at them – Palestinians shouldn’t have to live on handouts of good Israelis… it’s the same way I understand why there are attacks on white farms in South Africa. What they did is wrong, this is an explanation as to why, not whether or not it was wrong. It helps to form an understanding of why 75 years of apartheid and radicalization can drive people over the edge.
In the end, when this all started, some Hamas at least freed numerous hostages for humanitarian reasons. They are not all bad. Some of them are genuinely just resistance fighters and don’t want to do bad things and even have conflicts with other members who do. The same goes for the IDF (recommending basically every video produced by Breaking the Silence).
Still, I understand why Gazans are angry at them – Palestinians shouldn’t have to live on handouts of good Israelis… it’s the same way I understand why there are attacks on white farms in South Africa. What they did is wrong, this is an explanation as to why, not whether or not it was wrong. It helps to form an understanding of why 75 years of apartheid and radicalization can drive people over the edge.
That doesn’t change that Hamas’s goals and methods are genocidal in all but success rate. “Well, they were oppressed for so long” might be a ‘why’, but it’s hardly a ‘why’ worth mentioning; no more than the history of oppression of the Jews is worth mentioning when discussing the ongoing genocide of Palestinians. Ultimately, there is only one answer worth giving - that genocide is unacceptable, and whichever side is currently attempting it (Israel, in this case) must be punished, and the side that was recently attempting it (Hamas) must not be justified or lionized.
In the end, when this all started, some Hamas at least freed numerous hostages for humanitarian reasons. They are not all bad. Some of them are genuinely just resistance fighters and don’t want to do bad things and even have conflicts with other members who do. The same goes for the IDF (recommending basically every video produced by Breaking the Silence).
Propaganda moves and negotiations for hostage swaps aren’t signs of being ‘not all bad’ and not wanting to ‘do bad things’. Fuck man, every terrorist group of note in history makes those propaganda moves - terrorist states like Israel included.
Neither Hamas’ goals nor their methods are “genocidal”. They don’t call for the eradication of Jewish people. You can argue that if these massacres like October 7th continue, you can have a case for genocide. But now? Nah.
The final death toll from the attack is now thought to be 695 Israeli civilians, including 36 children, as well as 373 security forces and 71 foreigners, giving a total of 1,139.
Even including police, that’s a 32% civilian casualty ratio. Israel’s current civilian casualty ratio is between 20%-38%.
I ask again, what is the lowest civilian casualty ratio that suggests genocide to you? How many of the attacked locations have to be civilian targets in which only civilians were killed before you’ll admit that maybe Israel’s response of wholesale slaughter of civilians based on ethnicity does not retroactively justify Hamas’s attempts at the wholesale slaughter of civilians based on ethnicity?
Israel is killing 70% women and children. How the hell are you even going to 38%? Even 20% is an absurd claim. It’s likely around 95-98%.
The numbers are intended the other way around. The 32% I cited for Hamas suggests 68% of the deaths are civilians; the 20-38% I suggested for Israel suggests 80%-62% of Israel’s genocidal campaign are civilian deaths. I can see how you’d get the other interpretation.
I already explained the rest multiple times I don’t have time for repeated IDF trolling.
Explained is a cute word for ‘dismissed because targeting civilians hurts the hero-worship for Hamas you’re cultivating’
I suggested for Israel suggests 80%-62% of Israel’s genocidal campaign are civilian deaths. I can see how you’d get the other interpretation.
70% of Palestinians killed are owmen and children.
62% civilian deaths for israel means that you’re saying 100% of Palestinian men are Hamas and 8% of Palestinian women and children are Hamas. Either I’m still not understanding your claim or it’s a very stupid claim.
Explained is a cute word for ‘dismissed because targeting civilians hurts the hero-worship for Hamas you’re cultivating’
The IDF has already admitted there’s no babies in ovens, no pregnant women with bellies cut open, and many news outlets are throwing the rape stories out of the window because of credibility issues.
You want Hamas to be some evil monster org. They did some bad stuff sure but you’re comparing them to actual genocidal maniacs like the Nazis or israel.
They are war crimes but they are very clearly not genocide.
Only for lack of success.
I mean, their founding constitution literally says death to Israel. Lack of success is literally the only reason why.
Doesn’t justify Israel war crime, but people should atleast understand what both sides goals are.
No, no, they totally and radically changed in 2017, please ignore any history, context, statements, or actions past that point.
Good point. A renewed charter can be a sign of change but also a sign of trying to normalize one’s organization.
No it was pretty clear that they were not trying eradicate everyone. You don’t get 33% military kills when you’re going for genocide.
They shouldn’t have killed any civilians, but I understand why they’d attack an illegal settlement right outside their open air prison.
Yes, very illegal, this settlement
Despite it being “lovely”, it’s still on stolen Palestinian land, hence illegal.
Edit:
I read further (from the same link)
That’s great though, I respect that. That changes my view on that kibbutz. I don’t agree with Hamas’ blanket statements and generalization, and have been critical of them since I was first aware of their existence and lost many friends over it.
Still, I understand why Gazans are angry at them – Palestinians shouldn’t have to live on handouts of good Israelis… it’s the same way I understand why there are attacks on white farms in South Africa. What they did is wrong, this is an explanation as to why, not whether or not it was wrong. It helps to form an understanding of why 75 years of apartheid and radicalization can drive people over the edge.
In the end, when this all started, some Hamas at least freed numerous hostages for humanitarian reasons. They are not all bad. Some of them are genuinely just resistance fighters and don’t want to do bad things and even have conflicts with other members who do. The same goes for the IDF (recommending basically every video produced by Breaking the Silence).
It’s been Israeli since 1948. It’s not an illegal settlement under international law.
In 1946 actually.
PS: please see my edit on the comment on your link! thanks.
Yes, but Israel wasn’t formally declared until '48.
Its almost like they went to war with their allies and lost territory when they lost or something.
That doesn’t change that Hamas’s goals and methods are genocidal in all but success rate. “Well, they were oppressed for so long” might be a ‘why’, but it’s hardly a ‘why’ worth mentioning; no more than the history of oppression of the Jews is worth mentioning when discussing the ongoing genocide of Palestinians. Ultimately, there is only one answer worth giving - that genocide is unacceptable, and whichever side is currently attempting it (Israel, in this case) must be punished, and the side that was recently attempting it (Hamas) must not be justified or lionized.
Propaganda moves and negotiations for hostage swaps aren’t signs of being ‘not all bad’ and not wanting to ‘do bad things’. Fuck man, every terrorist group of note in history makes those propaganda moves - terrorist states like Israel included.
Neither Hamas’ goals nor their methods are “genocidal”. They don’t call for the eradication of Jewish people. You can argue that if these massacres like October 7th continue, you can have a case for genocide. But now? Nah.
Wholesale slaughter of civilians based on ethnicity and targeting of civilians centers based on the predominant ethnicity isn’t genocidal in method?
What would it take, theoretically, to convince you that Hamas’s goals remain genocidal? Other, of course, than their murderous actions?
I can find a great deal to dispute this.
Hence my statement that it wasn’t genocidal “Only for lack of success.”
This isn’t the first such attack. This isn’t even the second or the third. This is just the most successful one so far.
Military veteran recounts Israeli helicopter firing missiles in kibbutz Be’eri
Tank fires on Israeli civilian home in Kibbutz Be’eri, 7 October 2023
Hamas had hostages inside so the IDF decided to unalive everyone inside with the Hanibal doctrine :)
Ah, so all those people slaughtered at a music festival were dangerous, I see.
Funny because the civilian casualty ratio for Hamas is higher than that. What is the lowest civilian casualty ratio that suggests genocide to you?
Are you still on the 1400 deaths train? That was debunked long ago dude
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231215-israel-social-security-data-reveals-true-picture-of-oct-7-deaths
And the IDF shot tanks at the kibbutzes,
And the IDF helicopters shot hellfire missles at the kibbutzes.
The real civilian casualty count from just Hamas likeylies at 1/2 or lower.
Even including police, that’s a 32% civilian casualty ratio. Israel’s current civilian casualty ratio is between 20%-38%.
I ask again, what is the lowest civilian casualty ratio that suggests genocide to you? How many of the attacked locations have to be civilian targets in which only civilians were killed before you’ll admit that maybe Israel’s response of wholesale slaughter of civilians based on ethnicity does not retroactively justify Hamas’s attempts at the wholesale slaughter of civilians based on ethnicity?
Israel is killing 70% women and children. How the hell are you even going to 38%? Even 20% is an absurd claim. It’s likely around 95-98%.
I already explained the rest multiple times I don’t have time for repeated IDF trolling.
The numbers are intended the other way around. The 32% I cited for Hamas suggests 68% of the deaths are civilians; the 20-38% I suggested for Israel suggests 80%-62% of Israel’s genocidal campaign are civilian deaths. I can see how you’d get the other interpretation.
Explained is a cute word for ‘dismissed because targeting civilians hurts the hero-worship for Hamas you’re cultivating’
I think you have good points, but can I ask why you always jump to the assumption that people are hero-worshipping Hamas?
70% of Palestinians killed are owmen and children.
62% civilian deaths for israel means that you’re saying 100% of Palestinian men are Hamas and 8% of Palestinian women and children are Hamas. Either I’m still not understanding your claim or it’s a very stupid claim.
The IDF has already admitted there’s no babies in ovens, no pregnant women with bellies cut open, and many news outlets are throwing the rape stories out of the window because of credibility issues.
You want Hamas to be some evil monster org. They did some bad stuff sure but you’re comparing them to actual genocidal maniacs like the Nazis or israel.