• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I repeated my stance to reiterate my point, which you seemingly ignored since you repeated your points (which I addressed!) again.

    I’m not entirely sure why you repeated yours even after it was addressed, without so much as an acknowledgement that it had been addressed, it’s pointless at best and bad faith at worst. I can only assume the point of that was to make it look like I had not already addressed those points and that they were completely valid.

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      -110 months ago

      And I repeated mine to reiterate my point. No need for this conspiracy theory.