Fox News has pay walls, not the bee doesn’t and has mostly the same info. It’s basically the same thing as wapo or commondreams or salon, just from the other side of aisle.
That doesn’t answer my question at all, and in fact makes it worse. All of their articles are opinion pieces, and the fact that every second article here is one of theirs is absurd unless the point is to piss off conservatives with spurious reasoning and culture war bullshit.
Fox News has pay walls, not the bee doesn’t and has mostly the same info. It’s basically the same thing as wapo or commondreams or salon, just from the other side of aisle.
[email protected] has those as sources right now.
Fox News is garbage, too. They have been shown to be proven liars in court multiple times.
Who took the Washington Post to court for defamation and won a record-setting judgement? Fox defames people and institutions as a matter of course.
Politics has those bad commentary sites (which I would prefer they didn’t), but there are actual news sources posted there.
All I see here is commentary from people who are motivated to enrage conservatives based on spurious reasoning and culture war bullshit.
What is false in the article?
Among other stupid things it says, let’s focus on this one:
When have Texas judges ever had a say in immigration cases?
Like I said: this is just bait to piss off conservatives for outrage clicks.
and that is a fair criticism. State judges typically would not get a say in federal law.
So why would you trust a site who employs a writer and editor who believe otherwise? This is an extremely basic principle of federalism.
It only makes sense if the site is used to piss off conservatives and get those clicks. They know they’re lying.
It’s an opinion piece.
That doesn’t answer my question at all, and in fact makes it worse. All of their articles are opinion pieces, and the fact that every second article here is one of theirs is absurd unless the point is to piss off conservatives with spurious reasoning and culture war bullshit.