@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoLet's dive into this $118-billion flaming piece of garbage they call a bipartisan "border security" billnotthebee.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down146file-text
arrow-up1-40arrow-down1external-linkLet's dive into this $118-billion flaming piece of garbage they call a bipartisan "border security" billnotthebee.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-12•1 year ago interlocutor You can just say person, or commenter or debater if you want to be specific. Using fancy words for the sake of fancy words does nothing but make you look pretentious and make the conversation harder to follow.
minus-square@Zombiepiratelink10•edit-21 year agoI don’t want to have a conversation with you, so why would I care? I will not be responding to you again. Funny that you think using philosophy 101 words makes me pretentious though. Hilarious.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-12•1 year agoHow many people do you honestly think took that specific college course?
You can just say person, or commenter or debater if you want to be specific. Using fancy words for the sake of fancy words does nothing but make you look pretentious and make the conversation harder to follow.
I don’t want to have a conversation with you, so why would I care?
I will not be responding to you again.
Funny that you think using philosophy 101 words makes me pretentious though. Hilarious.
Why use fancy words when simple words better? /s
How many people do you honestly think took that specific college course?