The ruling is significant not only for its stark repudiation of Trump’s novel immunity claims but also because it breathes life back into a landmark prosecution that had been effectively frozen for weeks as the court considered the appeal.

Yet the one-month gap between when the court heard arguments and issued its ruling has already created uncertainty about the timing of a trial in a calendar-jammed election year, with the judge overseeing the case last week canceling the initial March 4 date.

Trump’s team vowed to appeal, which could postpones the case by weeks or months — particularly if the Supreme Court agrees to take it up. The judges gave Trump a week to ask the Supreme Court to get involved.

  • @agent_flounder
    link
    English
    910 months ago

    Except they have had the opportunity to do so, were warned against doing so by many legal professionals, and chose not to.

    Yeah they’re corrupt assholes but their decisions aren’t consistent with wanton destruction of the rule of law. So far.

    This talks in part about their decision on Independent State Legislature Doctrine which is what I’m basing the above on:

    https://www.vox.com/scotus/2024/2/6/24054902/supreme-court-trump-anderson-disqualification-insurrection-fourteenth-amendment

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      Yeah they’re corrupt assholes but their decisions aren’t consistent with wanton destruction of the rule of law. So far.

      Perhaps but in this case the relevant fact is that they’re corrupt assholes who have lifetime appointments that the GOP will defend at all costs and so they don’t need Trump for anything and aren’t beholden to him in any way.