• @aidan
    link
    271 year ago

    It’s not efficient, a huge amount of it gets diffused or absorbed

    • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
      link
      211 year ago

      It doesn’t need to be efficient. Capture all the light that hits earth for 5 minutes and that’s the world energy demand for a year.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      131 year ago

      It’s not efficient, a huge amount of it gets diffused or absorbed

      The amount that’s left over though is more than enough, especially with today panels which only convert a very small percentage of that remaining energy.

      As the panels improve even more they’ll be a very large energy surplus, even with how much solar light actually gets through the atmosphere.

    • @Furbag
      link
      -11 year ago

      Wow, you’re right! We should just build a Dyson sphere around the sun. 100% efficiency achieved. What could possibly go wrong?

      • @GojuRyu
        link
        81 year ago

        Did you understand the person you respond to as saying its inefficient because the sun shines in other directions than the array proposed?
        I’m pretty sure the person talked specifically about the beam from the array to earth being inefficient.

        • @Furbag
          link
          41 year ago

          I was joking, but apparently nobody picked up on my snarky sarcasm. Disregard.

      • @aidan
        link
        81 year ago

        Where did I say that?