Matters are not evenly distributed.

Edit: lol this is as controversial as I expected

  • Mario_Dies.wav
    link
    fedilink
    610 months ago

    Maybe in a Marxist-Leninist state, but not in communism defined as a stateless classless society. There is no ruling class in such a society.

    • Krafty Kactus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      And what happens as soon as you have a stateless and classless society?

      • Mario_Dies.wav
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        For those communities that do already have a stateless, classeless society, you mean? This happens.

        The TL:DR is that you function on the agreed-upon principles of horizontality and mutual aid, but I know that doesn’t sound like a satisifying answer, and there are so many ways that might look.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -110 months ago

      In China during the one-child policy, some people had multiple more than just one kid. You couldn’t buy that with money iirc. Tbh I don’t know much about China’s form of communism though

      • Mario_Dies.wav
        link
        fedilink
        1010 months ago

        China followed Maoism, which was also an authoritarian state. In such theories, they are “communist” in that they ostensibly seek to progress to a communist society. Tbh I doubt the sincerity of such a pursuit.

        There are communities that could be genuinely considered communist in its true form, but people typically don’t cite them as examples of communism working since they’re not nation-states … which is the whole point lol

      • daddyjones
        link
        110 months ago

        Not certain, but I’m fairly sure you could pay for more children.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Right, there were permits for it, but with what money, back before it went capitalist? Anyway, it was one of the perks of the ruling class.