YouTube disallowing adblockers, Reddit charging for API usage, Twitter blocking non-registered users. These events happen almost at the same time. Is this one of the effects of the tech bubble burst?

  • morgan423
    link
    51
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That doesn’t fix YouTube’s core issues with the ads that they run, impacting every free user without an ad blocker: 1) Not 100% safe 2) Unscrupulous advertisers, sometimes running scam ads 3) Poor user experience re: ads (far too many in general, and multiple mid-roll ads per video make for a horrendous time).

    I’m not going to reward them for these misbehaviors toward their user base by buying their “Premium” service. Same for any other site that does this and offers a “Premium service” to fix the problem that they, themselves, created. There are ways to have safe ads, and fair user experience even with them in play.

    EDIT: This was supposed to be a reply in a post chain below, and it got stuck as a new comment. Lemmy growing pains, lol (looks like we’ve added about 4k or so users on .world today alone… welcome new folks!)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Yeah, Youtube seriously needs to improve ad quality. I personally totally get that it’s an expensive site to run and have no problems with the fact that it needs to turn a profit (not every site can get by on donations alone and that’s okay). But the ads can get really bad sometimes. The majority are fine, but the number of scams and NSFW ads are still too high.

      TBH, I just paid the extra $2 to go from Youtube Music to Youtube Premium because I really didn’t want to see those ads and didn’t wanna deal with figuring out ad blocking for a Chromecast. But Youtube Premium isn’t worth it if you’re not already using Youtube Music (I would not have paid $12 for it) plus you have to use Youtube a certain amount for it to be worth it. Plus, of course, it shouldn’t be necessary to pay them not to see ads just to avoid seeing the bad ads.

      And all this does nothing about Youtube recommending videos (not ads) that are unethical. They don’t do a good job at curating videos. Heck, there’s been times where they age restrict LGBT videos for simply having any LGBT references but they’ll leave up crypto scams and hate speech filled alt right videos.

      • @DreamlandLividity
        link
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For me personally, its not even the principle with the bad ads. The reasons I won’t pay for preemium are:

        1. 12$ is too much, since I don’t live in the US and my pay is not at that level.
        2. I won’t pay to still have my data harvested and sold. If I pay for YT, there should be a different privacy policy with not using the data for anything outside video recommendations.
        3. I don’t want to pay for all the antifeatures YT pushes such as removing dislikes, not allowing channel search on mobile, messing with search reaults and recommendations…
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The bottom line is that I decide what content is received, interpreted, and rendered by my hardware. Youtube can kick and scream all they want, the nature of the internet is not in their favor. I prefer to directly support creators I follow, when and where I can.

      • @DreamlandLividity
        link
        81 year ago

        Intel is about to disagree with their DRM bullshit baked right into your CPUs silicon. Welcome to the “You will own nothing” future

        • @Beliriel
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          I’m pretty sure if they actually do that it has far reaching consequences and will get killed within a year by financial institutions. That is a massive security issue. Also AMD would rub their hands because it will flush a lot of money into their pockets to develop alternatives. They are already winning with CPUs.

          • @DreamlandLividity
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It does not cause security issues (that banks are concerned about). It is a DRM content decryption that is part of their TPM. So it is even considered a security feature that can more generally be used to ensure data can only be decrypted using the proper application the data was intended for. Netflix is already using it for 4k streaming. Read more here.