What’s America’s view on this Tucker Carlson?

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    English
    1181 year ago

    In general, IMO this is getting way more press than it deserves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      801 year ago

      Yeah, a lot of it is outrage bait. That is basically how Trump got elected, outrage -> coverage, coverage->legitimacy.

      • @Squizzy
        link
        English
        211 year ago

        It is fairly significant, he’s an aggressor in a war currently affecting everything from NATO to inflation. And he has denied access to Western interviewers up until now (in recent times).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 year ago

              Do you not understand the backlash Tucker Carlson is getting for doing this interview? Are you not aware of his history pushing pro-putin talking points? Tucker Carlsons content literally gets reposted on Russian state medias youtube.

              • @Squizzy
                link
                English
                81 year ago

                I don’t understand why you replied to me about it, I am aware of who he is and the type of cunt he is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Because our “free press” is just the “ad fee press” now. Their ONLY concern is how much they can profit off of news coverage. Outrage = clicks/views = ad revenue.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          That’s what happens when people don’t want to pay for anything, including journalism.

          What are the first 15 comments everytime someone posts a NYT article? “oh, no, paywall, fuck the NYT, greedy Bastards what money for their work”.

          You end up with tabloids, clickbait and ad infested shit pages.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, it is just a plain defect of capitalistic monetization schemes not aligning with what is good for society. Also, for-profit news stink of corruption and bourgeoisie propaganda with added deficiency of boring clickbait tabloid shitreads more adequate as toilet paper.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                We are talking about financing. You calling it “state run” only serves to reveal your own bias. It is very much possible to have non profit independent news as well as public funded news outside of politicians control. We have this in Norway, which is really fucking important because one fucking company has bought all for profit news agencies.

                Speaking of glory to the supreme leader, the company in question is also privately held like some sort of Succession fantasy.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Yes, Norway, the richest country of the world per capita, a very relatable and reproducible system.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Let us not pretend it is that much of an expense to have national public broadcast services. There is also PBS in the US, SVT in Sweden, BBC in the UK and so on. Just admit your point was pointless and the cherry picking was done on your side and move on.