• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    I believe it was a CBC article last fall that mentioned it, talking about the massive rise in acres burned from previous years. But I can’t directly give you a link at this time unfortunately, am on mobile and can’t find it either.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      I’d be really surprised if you could because it’s a made-up number.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Not made up, but estimated. Rather than find the exact article, here are the numbers after all was said and done:

        https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/sources-sinks-executive-summary-2023.html

        In 2021, Canada’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 670 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (couldn’t find 2023 quickly on mobile but it will be close)

        https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/copernicus-canada-produced-23-global-wildfire-carbon-emissions-2023

        The wildfires that Canada experienced during 2023 have generated the highest carbon emissions in record for this country by a wide margin. According to GFASv1.2 data, the wildfires that started to take place in early May emitted almost 480 megatonnes of carbon

        470 / 670 = 72%

        To be fair this is not 72% of total emissions including wildfire smoke, but wildfires emitted 72% as much as the Canadian economy did.

        So yes, it’s not 80% of total emissions - but it’s still a massive amount. Putting out these fires would have had nearly the same effect as shutting down our entire country and letting them burn.

        Or you could say letting them burn nearly doubled our emissions, and in the hand-wavey world of emissions accounting you would be pretty close.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          Not made up, but estimated.

          So yes, it’s not 80% of total emissions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 months ago

            Man it’s been like 6 months since I read it, give me a break lol. “80% of Canada’s emissions” is correct, it can just be read either way, and I remembered it the wrong way (as % of combined, not % of emissions)

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              English
              211 months ago

              There’s no Shane to admit you’re wrong.

              It’s the internet no one cares.