• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure, go ahead and blame the tool.
    Then blame the science.
    Then blame the scientists who developed it.

    Blame everything but the thief.

    \s


    Then blame free will for all crime in the world and all wars waged.

    • Ann Archy
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Removed by mod

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I remember one of my seniors at work asking me how open source software manages to develop so much without a direct monetary incentive.
        “There’s no lack of resources to give everyone everything they want.” <- is the point.

        Our civilisation has enough people who like coding, willing to put their spare time into OSS, to be able to get good quality tools for use in all fields. Now all we need is for all of those people to be given enough spare time without having to worry about things like mortgages, loan payments and basic survival in some cases and everyone can profit (including the companies who would be giving them the spare time).

    • @hyperhopper
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      First blame the thief. But then in the same breath blame the manufacturers that refuse to sell cars with meaningfully working locks. If you understand the tech many car companies keep selling cars that have locks that are about as secure as a zip tie.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The companies will just go around blaming some random engineer for it and then go on throwing money for PR stuff.