I’d expected this but it still sucks.

    • @nrezcm
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      No this is Patrick.

    • @TCB13
      link
      English
      -29 months ago

      He should really switch to LXD/Incus, not Proxmox as it will end like ESXi one day.

        • @TCB13
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

          Here’s one of my older LXD nodes running HA:

          It’s “so hard” to run HA under LXD… you just have to download the official HA OS image and import to LXD.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

            I hear that I lot of people are using LXC. Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

            • @TCB13
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

              Oh, my bad then. But yes, like Proxmox, LXD/Incus can do live migrations of VMs since 4.20 (2021 I believe). Live migration of containers can be done under specific circunstantes as well.

              Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

              In some of them yes. At least under Debian as long as you’ve set security.nesting=true it will work fine.