I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • @TCB13
    link
    English
    -6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    *proxmox*

    *LXD/Incus*

      • @TCB13
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Maybe I’m just doing it wrong. I’ve just found LXD to be lacking as you can’t live transfer it to a different host. It is also slower than Docker and Podman and I was unable to get docker running in a unprivileged LXC container. I think it should be possible to run docker in LXC but by the time I spend the effort is is more secure and easier to use a full virtual machine.

          Maybe I should revisit the idea though as it seems like many people stand by it.

          • @TCB13
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            I’ve just found LXD to be lacking as you can’t live transfer it to a different host

            It isn’t lacking… https://linuxcontainers.org/incus/docs/main/howto/move_instances/#move-instances but as with Proxmox there are details when it comes to containers. VMs can fully migrate live.

            I was unable to get docker running in a unprivileged LXC container

            What host OS are you running on? Did you set security.nesting true on said container?