So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    319 months ago

    people don’t think it be like it is but it do.

    anti-discrimination laws just mean employers can’t give the real reason so they’ve gotten really good at making up legally acceptable reasons.

    • @ilinamorato
      link
      9
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And in right to work “at-will” states, not even that much.

      • AnyOldName3
        link
        149 months ago

        You’re thinking of at-will employment states. Right to work is about joining unions and making that difficult.

        • @ilinamorato
          link
          49 months ago

          Ah right. Thank you for pointing that out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        “Right to work” means employees can work in a union shop and receive the benefits of such without having to join the union or pay dues. It’s a set of laws that have successfully destroyed unions.

        You’re thinking of “at will” employment laws, which means an employer can fire an employee for any reason or for no reason, but not for an illegal reason (which varies depending on state but includes the right to organize and rights against discrimination and retaliation).

        • @ilinamorato
          link
          29 months ago

          Oh, of course. Thank you for pointing that out.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Sorry - I should have realized others would point that out as well. I didn’t mean to pile on.

            • @ilinamorato
              link
              29 months ago

              No worries, I assumed it was done in good faith and appreciated the heads up. Thanks!

      • @BottleOfAlkahest
        link
        39 months ago

        You mean “at-will” states and that functionally means any state but Montana.