• @SpaceNoodle
    link
    99 months ago

    If we actually do self-driving cars right - i.e., with a safety-first approach - we could seriously reduce casualties.

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        119 months ago

        Probably because we can’t reasonably eliminate it right away.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -49 months ago

          Well I was being glib but I think we have a greater ability than to eliminate cars today than we do to make them safer by self driving. I think we could get it done in like 5 years outside of rural areas if we had everyone on board.

          • @DoomBot5
            link
            English
            39 months ago

            The verge’s article on the same incident went on a tangent about how tech companies have been continously facing issues with these kinds of devices destroyed. Can’t have a ride sharing program if all the bikes, scooters, vehicles are vandalized or destroyed. No way we’re going to rid of personally owned vehicles if the alternatives are continously under attack.

          • @SpaceNoodle
            link
            39 months ago

            “If we had everyone on board” is the biggest hurdle.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -19 months ago

              True but that’s why I’m here advocating for it. Political opposition can be overcome. The physics of a speeding multi-ton object cannot.

              • @SpaceNoodle
                link
                39 months ago

                Sure, but that’s gonna be at least half a generation leading up to your five year estimate.

              • El Barto
                link
                09 months ago

                That’s like advocating eliminating the use of skycrapers in five years. Where do you live that you think this is a totally realistic goal? Because it sounds like a cozy, sheltered bubble.