• @anamethatisnt
    link
    English
    7210 months ago

    Some alternatives:

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      Of these, I can recommend Proxmox. Its a decent learning curve coming from VMware, but once you learn the interface you’ll be able to configure things much like you would in Vsphere/ESXi.

      I recently started using the Proxmox Backup Server as well, and its pretty amazing. I got myself a super cheap VPS with 400gb storage, setup wireguard and installed the backup server. You just point Proxmox directly to it and it’ll do encrypted backups, scheduling, and easily keep any number of versions of your backups.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      English
      510 months ago

      Nutanix has its community edition which is free.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      There’s also harvester. The spec requirements are pretty heavy compared to some of the other options though.

      • @anamethatisnt
        link
        English
        7
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Harvester is a modern, open, interoperable, hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution built on Kubernetes.
        It is an open-source alternative designed for operators seeking a cloud-native HCI solution.
        https://github.com/harvester/harvester

    • Monkey With A Shell
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      XCP-NG, which I think was split off from an old Citrix branch or may be a clone, but it has a pretty solid set of features. Costs nothing unless you buy support or use their paid management appliance, but there’s an open version of that available as well.

    • @mint_tamas
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      What’s the background of the lxd-incus fork? On the project page they just state that it was forked after Canonical took over lxd - but what does that mean, exactly? How did they take over an open project? Was there a technical reason for a fork?

      • @anamethatisnt
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        I’d say from a business perspective this is the major thing:
        Real license of LXD

        Per the commit message performing the re-licensing, all further contributions will be under the AGPLv3 license and all contributions from Canonical employees have been re-licensed to AGPLv3.

        However, Canonical does not own the copyright on any contribution from non-employees, such as the many changes they have imported from Incus over the past few months. Those therefore remain under the Apache 2.0 license that they were contributed under.

        As a result, LXD is now under a weird mix of Apache 2.0 and AGPLv3 with no clear metadata indicating what file or what part of each file is under one license or the other.

        This is likely to make it very “fun” for anyone performing licensing reviews to evaluate LXD for adoption in their environment.

        Grabbed from this blog https://stgraber.org/2023/12/12/lxd-now-re-licensed-and-under-a-cla/